Legal Opinion
Bahr v. City of Litchfield
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 1987No. C9-86-1757PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Eugene Bahr and George Frelander appeal from the judgment entered in district court dismissing their petition for declaratory judgment, writ of certiorari and writ of mandamus. Their petition seeks review of the procedures used by the Litchfield Police Civil Service Commission and the City of Litchfield to fill two sergeant positions in the Litchfield Police Department. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In April 1983 Litchfield Police Civil Service Commission gave notice to all police department employees of the opening of two sergeant positions. At the time, the department…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Stolp v. ScrimshawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Appeal of O'RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Plunkett v. First National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Occupational License of HaymesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Bahr v. City of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Bahr v. City of LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987