Legal Opinion

M. v. County of San Mateo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 9, 2020No. 4:18-cv-05396Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 M. M., Case No. 18-cv-05396-YGR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, ET. AL., FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S 11 Defendants. MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY OF ROGER CLARK UNDER 12 FED. R. EVID. 702 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 51, 53, 59 14 Plaintiff M.M., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad litem, brings this action against 15 defendants County of San Mateo (the “County”),…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API