Legal Opinion

Ashe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1991No. 44 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

This matter comes to us on appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) terminating the disability benefits of Claimant Tony L. Ashe. The Board terminated benefits because it found that Ashe had refused reasonable treatment 1 and had also refused suitable available employment. 2 We reverse and remand.

On April 1, 1987, Claimant suffered a work-related back injury while in the employ of American Steel & Aluminum Corp. Claimant sought treatment from Dr. Ostdahl, a physician specializing in neurological surgery. Dr. Ostdahl diagnosed Claimant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carr v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Southwest Health Systems/Westmoreland Home Health v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Genuardi Supermarkets v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API