Ashe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
This matter comes to us on appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) terminating the disability benefits of Claimant Tony L. Ashe. The Board terminated benefits because it found that Ashe had refused reasonable treatment 1 and had also refused suitable available employment. 2 We reverse and remand.
On April 1, 1987, Claimant suffered a work-related back injury while in the employ of American Steel & Aluminum Corp. Claimant sought treatment from Dr. Ostdahl, a physician specializing in neurological surgery. Dr. Ostdahl diagnosed Claimant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carr v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Southwest Health Systems/Westmoreland Home Health v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Genuardi Supermarkets v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.