Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Cruz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1985No. Crim. 15485Published

1DissentLewis, J.

I respectfully dissent from the views expressed in part II of the majority opinion and from the portion of this court’s order granting Cruz the 303 days of conduct credit under Penal Code1 section 2931 for time he spent in Patton as an MDSO. In my view, this court is bound by California Supreme Court precedent to deny the credit. (Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455-456 [20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937].)

*653Persons such as Cruz, committed as MDSOs before the effective date of the repeal of the MDSO provisions, January 1, 1982, remain subject to continued…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. BrunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API