Hudson v. Cole
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
Since there was no insistence by counsel on the general grounds of the motion or on ground 6 of the amended motion for a new trial, these, under the repeated rulings of this court, are deemed abandoned. Also, may we point out, there is no special ground designated as ground 4. We go, then, for consideration, directly to the remaining special grounds, designated as grounds 5, 7, and 8.
The special ground designated as ground 5 contends that the court erred in giving the following charge to the jury: “I charge you further that the legal speed limit in this State is 50 m.p.h. from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glawson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Cowart v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- OB-Gyn Associates of Albany v. LittletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Bell v. SigalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Barrett v. CharlsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Jac O. Ullman, Jr. v. Overnite Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Hudson v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.