Legal Opinion

Rolfe v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Case by Charles A. Rolfe against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company for damages to personal property. There was judgment for plaintiff, and. defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff’s consignor delivered, to the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway, at Denver, for shipment to plaintiff at Adrian, Mich., an automobile of the value of $1,600, in good condition. The car was shipped by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway in B. & A. car No. 11,601. ' It was accepted by defendant in the same car in Chicago, and was forwarded in that car to Adrian. On opening the car at Adrian it was found that the automobile had never been braced in the car, and that its motion back and forth on the floor of the car jmd been guarded against in no other way than by nailing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L. Starks Co. v. Manistee & Northeastern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API