Krueger v. Market
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Rice county to determine adverse claims. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Childress, J., who found that plaintiff was the owner in fee simple of the premises described at the beginning of the opinion. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff brought this action to determine adverse claims to the south half of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 1Y in township 110 of range 20, and other adjoining lands, all situate in the county of Rice, and alleged that he was the owner and in the actual possession of the same. Defendant interposed an answer, in which he admitted plaintiff’s possession, but set forth a complete chain of title to himself from the United States for the 20-acre tract above described; and alleged that he was the owner and entitled to the possession thereof, and asked judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- East Tennessee Iron & Coal Co. v. WigginCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Tennessee Oil, Gas & Mineral Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Murphy v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tyler v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Tyler v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Dyer v. SianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.