Legal Opinion

Raynor v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 3, 2009No. AC 29544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The petitioner, Radcliffe Raynor, appeals, following a grant of certification to appeal by the habeas court, from the judgment of the court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he claimed ineffective assistance of trial counsel in his criminal trial. The petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that his trial counsel was not ineffective in (1) failing properly to prepare for and to investigate prior to trial and (2) failing to recall a certain witness in the criminal trial. We conclude that the first claim is not properly before us and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Collins v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. RaynorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Saunders v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Raynor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Raynor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API