Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 17, 2010No. AC 30447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The petitioner, Lucis Richardson, following a grant of certification to appeal by the habeas court, appeals from the judgment of the court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his habeas petition because his trial counsel had provided him with ineffective assistance. We conclude that the petitioner did not adequately brief his claim and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

This court’s decisions in the petitioner’s previous direct appeals provide the necessary factual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. John TimbanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Morant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. State v. RichardsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Gonzalez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Dunn v. EtzelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Richardson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API