Bhat v. University of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Geetha Bhat appeals judgment for defendants following a jury trial in this action for gender and national origin discrimination in employment. Dr. Bhat’s claims on appeal arise from the district court’s handling of a juror following a poll of the jury, during which the juror dissented from the verdict. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 13, 1998, Dr. Bhat filed a complaint against the University of Cincinnati, *282Richard Walsh, M.D., and John J. Hutton, M .D., alleging employment discrimination and retaliation on the basis of national…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Paul Lash (90-1449), Richard Tommasi (90-1450), Lawrence Dresner (90-1451), and Carol Ross (90-1500)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- King v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Ahmed BrikaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Robinson v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Abbott v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Swartz v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- United States v. BrikaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005