Legal Opinion

Bhat v. University of Cincinnati

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 3, 2001No. 00-3529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Geetha Bhat appeals judgment for defendants following a jury trial in this action for gender and national origin discrimination in employment. Dr. Bhat’s claims on appeal arise from the district court’s handling of a juror following a poll of the jury, during which the juror dissented from the verdict. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

On April 13, 1998, Dr. Bhat filed a complaint against the University of Cincinnati, *282Richard Walsh, M.D., and John J. Hutton, M .D., alleging employment discrimination and retaliation on the basis of national…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Paul Lash (90-1449), Richard Tommasi (90-1450), Lawrence Dresner (90-1451), and Carol Ross (90-1500)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. King v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ahmed BrikaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Robinson v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Abbott v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Swartz v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. United States v. BrikaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API