Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Chapman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 129A81PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Plaintiff Crowell sued a class of defendants pursuant to Rule 23 of the N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter she lost her status as a real party in interest in the case and filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a). After joining the Bowers who had become the real parties in interest as parties plaintiff, Judge Johnson vacated plaintiff Crowell’s motion of voluntary dismissal, in effect maintaining Crowell as a party plaintiff in the case. The Court of Appeals found no error in this result. We disagree and reverse.

On 6 July 1978 plaintiff Crowell filed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Labor of North Car. v. Dillard'sDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Land v. TALL HOUSE BUILDING CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Hansen v. Crystal Ford-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. In re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API