Legal Opinion
McClure v. Biesenbach
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided April 12, 2005No. 1:04-cv-00797Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY OF SAN ANTONIO’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FURGESON, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Second Motion of Defendant City of San Antonio (“City”) to Dismiss, filed on January 3, 2005, along with Plaintiffs’ Response. The Court held a hearing on February 23, 2005 and finds that Plaintiffs have adequately stated causes of action against the City. As a result, Defendant City of San Antonio’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 24) should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Factual and Procedural Background
The instant case is brought against the City…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.