Legal Opinion

Kroger Company v. Giem

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

387 S.W.2d 620 (1964)

The KROGER COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Seth E. GIEM, Individually and dba Seth E. Giem & Associates, and John E. Bouchard & Sons Co., Inc., Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

November 12, 1964.

Rehearing Denied February 4, 1965.

William J. Harbison, Trabue, Minick, Sturdivant & Harbison, Miller Manier, Manier, Crouch, White & Herod, Nashville, for plaintiff in error.

Goodpasture, Carpenter, Woods & Courtney, Nashville, Carl N. Stokes, Memphis, for Seth E. Giem.

Boult, Hunt, Cummings & Conners, Glasgow & Adams Nashville, for John E. Bouchard & Sons Co., Inc.

WHITE,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Moody v. Gufl Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API