Amax Coal Co. v. Haynie
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This case involves the application of the Worker’s Compensation Act (§ 27-310, W.S. 1957, as amended, et seq., now § 27-12-101, W.S.1977, et seq.) to an occlusion of an internal carotid artery. The occlusion became manifest about 9Vz weeks after the employment incident which is accused as being causative. The employer resists payment, contending that there does not exist substantial credible evidence establishing that the injury was the legal and medical result of the employment incident. In its Judgment the district court awarded to the employee the payment in full of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Rocky Mountain Trucking Co. v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- White v. Maverick Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Ogden Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. AleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunteman v. Ward Transport, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of HaynieWyoming Supreme Court · 1979