Legal Opinion

In re Seiffert

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 2, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

Objections by the Moore Hardware & Implement Company, of Moore, in Fergus county, to the petition for discharge of above-named debtors, were referred to a special master, Ralph J. Anderson, Esq., of Lewistown, who, after taking the testimony, made his findings and conclusions apparently from his own independent investigation of the law, as no briefs or memoranda of authorities for either side appear in the files.

Concealment of assets and false oath- to the schedules are the two grounds upon which the opposition to discharge is based. The evidence offered before the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Winslow v. DundomMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Edison v. BabkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. E. S. Bonnie & Co. v. Perry's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. In re DriggsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Forsythe v. ElkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Miller v. Mutual Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API