Legal Opinion
Edison v. Babka
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1896PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Trover by George M. Edison against Joseph Babka and Delia Babka. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff as the assignee of a certain contract, which reads as follows:
“Memorandum of agreement made and entered into this 6th day of November, A. D. 1889, by and between Mrs. Dolly Orcutt and Joseph Babka and Delia Babka, his wife, of the township of Plainfield, county of Kent, *236and State of Michigan, parties of the first part, and Chas. E. Knapp, of the township of Grand Rapids, county of Kent, and State of Michigan, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“That Chas. E. Knapp is to furnish enough peach trees to set out a certain piece of land, to the amount of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Naylor v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Sloan v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crane Ice Cream Co. v. Terminal Freezing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Baltimore & O. S. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Menard v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Detroit Postage Stamp Service Co. v. SchermackMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.