Ronald J. Dakter v. Dale L. Cavallino
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, C.J.
¶ 99. (concurring). The central issue presented is whether the circuit court erred by giving the jury a special skills instruction because Dale L. Cavallino held a commercial license to operate the semi-truck at the time of the accident.1 I conclude that the circuit court's special skills instruction was erroneous because it incorrectly stated the law. However, I also conclude that the error was harmless. Accordingly, I would affirm the court of appeals, and although I do not join the majority opinion, I respectfully concur.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 100. The majority opinion fully sets out the facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Fischer Ex Rel. Fischer v. GanjuWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. LeederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Lutz v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Cervelli v. GravesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.