Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1935No. 3110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTHALL, Justice.

We will designate the parties, respectively, plaintiffs and defendant, as in the trial court.

The court overruled defendant’s plea in abatement, of which it complains here.

*302The court sustained defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiffs’ original petition, of which they complain here.

Plaintiffs’ petition is paragraphed, and we will maintain that division and, as briefly as we can, state the material facts alleged in each of the paragraphs.

Plaintiffs, Russell E. Smith and wife, sue the city of Dallas and Dr. J. H. Stephenson, and allege:(1) Plaintiffs and Dr. Stephenson are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Fort Worth v. WigginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. City of Wichita Falls v. MauldinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. City of Belton v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City & County of Dallas v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Smith v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Smith v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API