Bice v. Steverson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This is the second appeal in this case. Bice v. Steverson, 205 Ala. 576, 88 South. 753. We there held that the defendant’s -special plea 16, of contributory negligence, was not subject to the grounds of demurrer, that the negligence there set up was a mere conclusion. We adhere to the former ruling. The plea, however, was not a good answer to the wanton counts, and was subject to the plaintiff’s twenty-third groundi of demurrer, but accurate pleading would suggest that the demurrer should have specified or designated the wanton counts. Especially is this true when the complaint contained as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Bice v. SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Monte v. NarramoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Britling Cafeteria Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Black Star Coal Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Culverhouse v. GammillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Hill Grocery Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956