Legal Opinion

Hemmings Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1961No. Appeal, No. 299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, the referee and the board refused compensation to appellant and found that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature under §402 (b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (b) (1).

Appellant was originally employed as a mechanic by Medical Arts Garage, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on August 16, 1957. In January of 1958 he was assigned to duty in the warehouse as an overseer. Subsequently his work alternated between work as a mechanic and *605work in the warehouse. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Johnson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Coyle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Pomorski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uniweld Products, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL REL. COM'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Tannariello v. FED'N OF PUBLIC EMPS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API