Hemmings Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, the referee and the board refused compensation to appellant and found that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature under §402 (b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (b) (1).
Appellant was originally employed as a mechanic by Medical Arts Garage, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on August 16, 1957. In January of 1958 he was assigned to duty in the warehouse as an overseer. Subsequently his work alternated between work as a mechanic and *605work in the warehouse. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierce Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Johnson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Coyle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Pomorski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Uniweld Products, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL REL. COM'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Tannariello v. FED'N OF PUBLIC EMPS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983