Legal Opinion

Coyle Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1960No. Appeal, No. 481PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant in this unemployment compensation case, was denied benefits by the bureau, the referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that he voluntarily terminated his employment and was therefore disqualified under section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b).

Claimant had worked approximately four years for Chester Czarneeki, Shamokin, Pennsylvania, as a grocery clerk. His last day of employment was March 7, 1959. On that date claimant.and his employer engaged in an argument over claimant’s performance of his duties. The employer told claimant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Hamilton Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Kaminski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Hemmings Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Lara v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API