Legal Opinion

Pipe v. The La Salle

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The libelants herein have moved the court for an order overruling the respondent’s exceptions to the libel, and directing, that respondent answer the libel.

This is an admiralty action where thelibelants seek damages for the respondent’s-alleged violation of the contracts of carriage whereby, as a result thereof, four shipments of sugar from Manila to ports-along the East coast of the United States-were discharged at destination in an impaired condition. The papers submitted on this motion show that the shippers, the principals of the libelants, are Philippine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KawatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ex Parte ColonnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Insurance Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. H. P. Drewry, S.A.R.L. v. OnassisNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Manila Motors Co. v. The IvaranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisser v. International BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API