Kelly v. Wengler
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
(Filed Under Seal)
DAVID 0. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for a Contempt-Phase Discovery Plan (Dkt. 40, 40, “Motion for Discovery”) filed by Plaintiffs, and a Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should not be Held in Contempt (Dkt. 39, “Motion for an OSC”). There is also a separate issue, to be resolved in a later order, about whether the motions and submissions should be unsealed (see Dkt. 50).
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs seeks a hearing and discovery on the issue of whether Defendant Corree*1238tions Corporation of America (“CCA”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warren v. City of ChicoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025