Legal Opinion
McMullen v. Kutz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 2009No. 103 MAP 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
985 A.2d 769 (2009)
Marjorie R. McMULLEN, Appellant
v.
Ronald E. KUTZ, Appellee.
No. 103 MAP 2007
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued May 14, 2008.
Decided December 28, 2009.
Lisa Marie Coyne, Coyne & Coyne, P.C., Camp Hill, for Marjorie R. McMullen.
Karl Ernst Rominger, Rominger & Associates, Carlisle, for Ronald E. Kutz.
BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, McCAFFERY, JJ.
OPINION
Justice BAER.
We granted review in this case to determine whether a court may consider the reasonableness of attorney fees claimed in a breach of contract action where the contract does not specify that the fees…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Mahani v. Edix Media Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.