Legal Opinion
United States v. Randall Scott Adkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1973No. 72-2336Published
1Opinion of the Court
474 F.2d 381
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randall Scott ADKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-2336.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1973.
Don H. Marmaduke (argued), of Marmaduke, Aschenbrenner, Merten & Saltveit, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.
D. Richard Hammersley, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Joseph E. Buley, Asst. U. S. Atty., S. I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.
JAMESON, District Judge:
Randall Scott Adkins appeals his conviction by the court sitting without a jury of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fred Lawton v. Curtis W. TarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Schemanski v. TarrDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- United States v. BornDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1972
- Smith v. TarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Mark Burdick BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.