Legal Opinion
United States v. Born
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 18, 1972No. G-203-71 CrPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FOX, Chief Judge.
Petitioner has been indicted for willfully and knowingly failing to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States, in violation of 50 App. United States Code, § 462. He has moved this court to dismiss the indictment on grounds that the order which directed him to report for induction was invalid and untimely under the Selective Service regulation recorded in Title 82 of Code of Federal Regulations, § 1631.7(d) (5). He also asserts that his local board’s rejection of his request for classification as a conscientious objector was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fred Lawton v. Curtis W. TarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Schemanski v. TarrDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Robert James GazdaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States of America Ex Rel. Lowell Peter Iverson v. Col. Wayne RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Mark Burdick BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Randall Scott AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States ex rel. Sugg v. Commanding Officer United States Armed Forces Examing & Entrance StationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.