Legal Opinion

Clavenna v. Holsey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1978No. Docket 77-1262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of accelerated judgment in favor of defendant Holsey. We affirm.

On September 7, 1974, plaintiffs, Michigan residents, were passengers on a 38-foot cruiser owned and operated by defendant Purdie, also a Michigan resident, in Canadian waters of the Detroit River between Belle Isle and Peche Island. At about 10:40 p.m., the Purdie boat collided with a 36-foot cruiser owned and operated by defendant Holsey, a citizen and resident of Ontario, Canada. When the operators of the two boats turned sharply in opposite directions in an attempt to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kiefer v. MayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Woods v. Edgewater Amusement ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Amburn v. Harold Forster Industries, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Storie v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber TransferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Kircos v. Lola Cars LimitedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Martin v. DeschenesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Jones v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Zandee v. ColistoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API