Legal Opinion

Gabrellian & Jessourian Associates v. Borough of Oakland

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided September 5, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABTREE, J.T.C.

This is a local property tax case wherein plaintiff seeks direct review, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, of the 1988 assessment on its property located at 345-349 Ramapo Valley Road, Oakland, New Jersey (Block 2318, Lot 10). The assessment was:

[[Image here]]

At issue are the true value of the subject property and the applicability of N.J.S.A. 54:51A-6, commonly referred to as chapter 123. The year 1988 was not a revaluation year.

The subject of the controversy is a neighborhood shopping center containing a Sears Roebuck & Co. outlet store (21,700 square feet), a free-standing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Dvorkin v. Township of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Dworman v. Borough of Tinton FallsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
  4. Worthington v. FauverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Dworman v. Tinton FallsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laneco Three, Inc. v. Township of FranklinNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
  2. Newton Town v. Newton Medical BuildingNew Jersey Tax Court · 1993
  3. First Republic Corp. v. Borough of East NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  4. Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API