Legal Opinion

Dworman v. Tinton Falls

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 21, 1981PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

180 N.J. Super. 366 (1981)

LESTER J. DWORMAN; L.J.D. ENTERPRISES, INC.; THE DWORMAN COMPANY OF N.J.; CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE AND REALTY TRUST; AND SHREWSBURY ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, (FORMERLY BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 27, 1981.

Decided August 21, 1981.

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

Leo Rosenblum argued the cause for appellant (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys).

Irving C. Marcus argued the cause for respondents (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys; Mr.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of CarlstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Bernards TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Edison TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988
  4. Warren Tp. v. SuffnessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. BonsangueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API