Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McKnight.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2013No. SCWC-28901Published

1Dissent

Dissent to Part III: Regarding the Search Warrant, by

ACOBA, J.,

with whom McKENNA, J., joins.

Ours is a long legal history and tradition of protecting the privacy rights of all persons within the State’s territorial boundaries. This fundamental pillar of our State bill of rights can only endure if the judiciary remains faithful to holding inviolate individual protections under the Hawai'i Constitution. Although not labeled as such, the decisions by the majority on the warrant issue herein (Opinion of the Court with respect to Part III, by Recktenwald, C.J.) (hereinafter “majority opinion”) and…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API