Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Small Business Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 6, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1365Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLARENCE E. BALDWIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1365 (RDM) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se complaints are “‘held to less stringent [pleading] standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (citation omitted). At some point, however, the Court cannot proceed with a case in the absence of a properly framed legal dispute. Here, the plaintiff, Clarence Baldwin, filed a FOIA action seeking records that the defendant, the Small Business Administration…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. William C. Shea v. Donohoe Construction Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Gardner, Bruce E. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API