Legal Opinion
Gardner, Bruce E. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 19, 2000No. 99-5065PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
Bruce Gardner, appearing pro se, appeals the District Court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mr. Gardner alleges that the Internal Revenue Service (“the Service”) unlawfully levied his property without first sending a notice of federal tax deficiency to his last known address. The District Court dismissed this complaint sua sponte for failure to prosecute under Fed.R.CivP. 41(b) (“Rule 41(b)”) and, upon defendant’s motion, for lack of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Jiggetts v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Leroy Bolt v. Robert Loy and Village of Winthrop HarborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ficken v. GoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.