Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-2172PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Richard Goldman (“plaintiff’), a member of the New York Bar proceeding pro se, brings this action against defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US, LLC (“Fiat”), 1 Safety Net Promotions (“Safety Net”), and John Does 1-10 (collectively “defendants”) alleging breach of contract, tortious inference with contractual relations, and “tortious prevention of plaintiff from completing added requirements for the contract.” Plaintiff does not allege any claims arising under federal law. Upon consideration of the Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Willard J. Rosenboro v. Dr. Andrew KimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. Cvs PharmacyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Early v. Ace Cash CheckingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Earth Island Institute v. Coca-Cola CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Sopkin v. LopattoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023