Legal Opinion
Bell v. Cvs Pharmacy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 15, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0128Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREEMAH BELL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 128 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan CVS PHARMACY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Kareemah Bell, proceeding pro se, sued CVS Pharmacy in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia alleging racial profiling and harassment. CVS removed the case to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) and moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons below, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.