State v. Harris, 08ap-723 (3-17-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Rosevelt Harris ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, which, following a jury trial, convicted him of telecommunications harassment in violation of R.C. 2917.21(B).
{¶ 2} On appeal, appellant asserts only one assignment of error, as follows:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT CONVICTED THE DEFENDANT OF A VIOLATION OF R.C. 2917.21(B), WHICH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON ITS FACE AND WAS ALSO APPLIED UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TO THE DEFENDANT SINCE IT PUNISHED CONDUCT THAT IS PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
{¶ 3} In his sole assignment,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. American Bail Bond AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Akron v. KirbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2011