Legal Opinion

State v. Harris, 08ap-723 (3-17-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2009No. 08AP-723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Rosevelt Harris ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, which, following a jury trial, convicted him of telecommunications harassment in violation of R.C. 2917.21(B).

{¶ 2} On appeal, appellant asserts only one assignment of error, as follows:

THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT CONVICTED THE DEFENDANT OF A VIOLATION OF R.C. 2917.21(B), WHICH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON ITS FACE AND WAS ALSO APPLIED UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TO THE DEFENDANT SINCE IT PUNISHED CONDUCT THAT IS PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

{¶ 3} In his sole assignment,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. American Bail Bond AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. City of Akron v. KirbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API