Chisholm v. Hipes
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Justice.
This is a suit brought by a licensed real estate broker, M. J. Chisholm, to recover the balance of a commission allegedly due and owing him under a real estate contract and alternatively for the reformation of the contract to correct the description of the land to be conveyed. Defendant Mary In-man Hipes, as Executrix of the Estate of J. S. Hipes, deceased, answered that the action was barred by the Statute of Frauds Provision of the Texas Real Estate Act; that reformation was unavailable on the facts; and that plaintiff’s causes of action were barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Greer v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kenney v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Lathem v. Richey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Broyles v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Corman v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Arthur P. Gale Realtors v. BelisleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.