Legal Opinion

Deauville Associates, Inc. v. Eristavi-Tchitcherine

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1949No. 12436PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The fact that appellant, who sought to intervene in the Court below, had acquired its alleged interest in the subject matter of this litigation from parties who violated an injunction of the Court in transferring such interest to the petitioner, should not necessarily defeat or destroy whatever right, title, and interest in such property that the petitioner acquired from such contemnor. The Court in such circumstances has the unquestioned right and power to require such a contemnor to purge himself of contempt as a matter of punishment, but in so doing it should not deprive such purchaser of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Kelley v. Summers Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Kelley (Two Cases). Kelley v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. Britt v. BrittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  4. In the Matter of Dallas Cabana, Inc., Bankrupt. Dallas Cabana, Inc. v. Wilson F. Collier, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Deauville Associates, Inc. v. Lojoy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API