Legal Opinion
Ahammed v. Securities Investor Protection Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2002No. 00-3214Published
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, thirteen individual claimants in the liquidation proceeding of a failed broker-dealer (collectively, “Claimants”), seek protection under the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA) and payment of their claims from the insurance fund established by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC).
I
The debtor, Primeline Securities Corporation (“Primeline”), was a licensed securities broker-dealer registered with the Securities Exchange Commission and a member of SIPC. 1 Claimants’ claims in the liquidation proceeding are based upon financial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Durability, Inc., Debtor. James R. Adelman, Trustee v. Fourth National Bank and Trust Company, N.A., of Tulsa, Ok, Fred I. Palmer, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. Hart, Debtors. Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hill v. KinzlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.