Legal Opinion

Tison v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1852PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Bowie.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

There are but two points assigned for error in this case 'thought to be worthy of notice.

Eii-ft, that tlie, court below erred in excluding the evidence offered to show that Smith at tins lime, of the contract did not own all the laud which in his ■contract ho liad offered to convey by good title to Tison. It is not believed that there, was any error in such rejection. If Smith was willing-, ready, and .able to make litio at the, time, lie had undertaken by his contract to make that tide, his not being able to do so at the date of his contract-would be wholly ■immaterial, even under the most…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Storey v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Caprito v. Grisham-Hunter CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API