Legal Opinion

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Company

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 19, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * * 9 CARSON CITY, a consolidated municipality Case No. 3:22-cv-00006-LRH-CLB and political subdivision of the State of 10 Nevada, ORDER 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation; ROE 14 COMPANIES I – X; and DOE INDIVIDUALS I – X, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Carson City’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 28. 19 Defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) opposed the motion (ECF No. 31) 20 and Carson City replied to the opposition (ECF No. 32).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API