Legal Opinion

Friedman

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 21, 1977No. Nos. 175-73 and 178-72PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"These consolidated cases come before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, filed August 17, 1976, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, filed January 17,1977, having been submitted on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. Plaintiffs were classified Civil Service employees and veterans’ preference eligibles employed as GS-1955-11 Space System Quality Control Specialists at the Naval Plant Representative Office (NAVPRO) in Bethpage, New York, until June 24, 1971. On that date, plaintiffs were separated from federal service by a reduction-in-force (RIF) which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Perlman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Wilmot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Barger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dancy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Kenneth M. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Staskus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Levinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. EllisUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API