Legal Opinion
Washington v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1031 (RMU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
I. INTRODUCTION
Today presents the question of whether a party may lose his job before his day in court. The plaintiffs, employees suspended with pay from the D.C. Department of Corrections (“DOC”), request that the court issue a preliminary injunction ordering the defendant 1 the District of Columbia, not to terminate the plaintiffs’ employment while their civil suit, challenging the constitutionality of ongoing disciplinary procedures, is pending in this court. The defendant,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Acosta v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- District of Columbia v. MasucciDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014