Legal Opinion

Hornblower v. Austin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1933No. Appeal 212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from the order of the lower court entering judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Plaintiffs brought an action in assumpsit against the defendant for the sum of $193.40 with interest from June 24, 1929, being the proceeds of sale of certain stock rights in the Chesapeake Corporation, received by the defendant.

The facts are not in dispute.

On May 10, 1929, and prior thereto John M. Austin, the defendant, was the owner of record of ten shares of stock of the Chesapeake Corporation and on that day he sold the' said ten shares…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Corgan v. George F. Lee Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Richter & Co. v. LightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Houser v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Rose v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Milwaukee Gear Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gontarski v. GrzybSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Girard Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API