Legal Opinion

State v. Howe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1970No. Cr. 391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Judge.

Frank Howe has appealed to this Court from the verdict of guilty and final judgment upon a conviction of the crime of burglary in the Burleigh County District Court. Mr. Howe’s specification of error is that the district court failed to grant his written, oral, and standing motion for a return of seized property and for suppression of evidence. Thus, Hr. Howe, has raised the issue of whether the verdict of the jury resulted from inadmissible evidence submitted at the trial.

Mr. Howe was convicted of burglarizing the Bismarck residence of Arseius Volk, from which used wearing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. PageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. WetschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API