Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 23, 2002No. CR.02-10102-MLWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
The court recently received and read the Presentence Report (“PSR”) concerning William H. Anderson in anticipation of his sentencing, which was scheduled for October 17, 2002. Neither party objected to any part of the PSR that relates to the calculation of the guideline range or possible sentence. However, the court questions whether Probation and the parties have properly calculated the guideline range for Anderson’s sentence. In addition, the PSR does not include the information which the court provided to Probation and the parties on June 20, 2002…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Focus 15, LLC v. NICO CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Gardner v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021