Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 21, 2003No. CR. 02-10102-MLWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
For the reasons described in detail at the March 18, 2003 hearing, and summarized in this Memorandum, the following rulings were made in connection with the sentencing of defendant William Anderson.
1. Because the current Guidelines Manual, with the Amendments effective November 1, 2002, does not provide for more punishment than the November 1, 2000 Guidelines Manual that was in effect at the time of Anderson’s crime of making a false statement to a government investigator, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, the current Manual was applied.
More…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. SilveiraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003