In re Rochester Urban Renewal Agency

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The principal argument for reversal made by appellant herein is that the judgment cannot stand because the trial court failed to disclose the details of its computations in arriving at its award. There was essential agreement by the opposing appraisers as to the highest and best use of the condemned property; and both used the market data approach in their evaluation thereof. Appellant’s appraiser, however, estimated the subject *1036property at 75 cents per square foot, whereas respondent’s appraiser estimated it at $2.20 per square foot. The…