Legal Opinion

United States v. E.O.A. Senior House, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1992No. Civ. No. LR-C-91-161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff, Docket Entry No. 7, *786filed by Mr. Andrew Jeffries. Also before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket Entry No. 12, filed by the plaintiff, the United States of America. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff will be denied and the Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Pursuant to Section 202 of the National Housing Act of 1959, 12 U.S.C. § 1701q, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loaned the defendant, E.O.A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. J. J. Curran v. Merrill LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. John Sanitary District v. Town of ScherervilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. International Ventures, Inc. v. Block Properties VII (In Re International Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API