Legal Opinion

Deck v. Hammer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 16, 1968No. 1 CA-CIV 474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Superior Court sitting without a jury in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $3,505.00 for “drilling services rendered” and $4,000.00 for plaintiff’s attorney fees.

We are called upon to determine:

1. If the findings of fact and the judgment are supported by the evidence.

2. If the trial court was correct in denying certain counts of defendant’s counterclaim.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. In November of 1963 the plaintiff doing business under the firm name and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Thunderbird Metallurgical Inc. v. Arizona Testing LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Brand v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Carrasco v. CarrascoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Perry v. FarmerArizona Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. E-Z Livin' Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TommaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Frank Stinson Chevrolet, Inc. v. ConnellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Henningson, Durham & Richardson v. ProchnowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Murdock v. Mingus Union High School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API