Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Fulton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2008No. 90288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boyle, M.J., Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Antonio Fulton, appeals from a judgment of the Cleveland Municipal Court denying his motion for return of property and granting the city’s petition for forfeiture. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

{¶2} On April 18, 2007, the city of Cleveland charged Fulton with using weapons while intoxicated, failing to secure dangerous ordnance, and endangering children. Fulton entered a plea of not guilty to the charges, and the case proceeded to a bench trial.

{¶ 3} Two Cleveland police officers testified at trial that when they approached…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. CruiseOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API